In addition, the data obtained are informants' information, documentation, and are not numbers.īased on the results of the study, the results obtained are as follows: 1) The consideration of the judges of the Mataram High Court in determining mut’ah levels and iddah livelihoods on divorce cases is observing from work, income, wife who is not incoherent and also to the old wife accompany her husband in fostering a family. ![]() Data collection techniques use study decisions, documentation, and interviews. The type of research used is qualitative research. ![]() This study aims to find out how the judge's judgment and whether the judges of the Mataram High Court in determining the level of mut’ah and livelihood in the divorce case have fulfilled the principles of justice, usefulness, and legal certainty. The decision of the judge of the Religious High Court is considered the final place, although it can submit an appeal to the Supreme Court which is the highest institution in the area of ?the religious court, so the researcher raises this title and formulates the problem that is the direction of the research. ![]() Judges' considerations often do not provide satisfaction and do not provide a sense of justice to the parties.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |